Cochrane Review A122 - attempts to discredit authors and underplay the content.
The mismatch undermining the publication of A122
To summarise the story, the 2006 A122 protocol and the previous versions drew little interest despite being co-published in the BMJ twice. The 2009 BMJ version drew - all of - three comments.
For the 2020 update, things changed radically: governments released pro-mask-wearing statements and instigated mandates—the point when our A122 came into conflict …
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Trust the Evidence to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.