Trust the Evidence

Trust the Evidence

Share this post

Trust the Evidence
Trust the Evidence
Cochrane review A122: what filled the Cochrane basket when A122 was delayed?

Cochrane review A122: what filled the Cochrane basket when A122 was delayed?

How Archie Cochrane’s agenda was trashed

Tom Jefferson's avatar
Carl Heneghan's avatar
Tom Jefferson
and
Carl Heneghan
Sep 13, 2023
∙ Paid
49

Share this post

Trust the Evidence
Trust the Evidence
Cochrane review A122: what filled the Cochrane basket when A122 was delayed?
2
2
Share

Let’s take one the founding principles of the then Cochrane Collaboration:“minimising bias”. Let’s set it into the context of the often reported events surrounding Cochrane review A122 (Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses).

The review was started in 2006 and has been updated five times, the last time in January 2023.

Share

We looked at ten Cochrane Reviews published during or around the A122 delay gap, we extracted the search date and publication date and calculated the days from the search to publication. We then extracted the data for the included study designs (see the table). 

The shortest time to publication was within 26 days of the search; the longest was 477 days (median 82 days). For one review, we couldn’t make sense of the date as the publication came before the search.

The longest time was spent on a scoping review of the Unintended consequences of measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID‐19 pandemic. Given the impor…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Trust the Evidence to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Carl Heneghan
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share