Trust the Evidence

Trust the Evidence

Share this post

Trust the Evidence
Trust the Evidence
Investigating the miracle biologic Lecanemab for Alzheimer's Disease - Part 6

Investigating the miracle biologic Lecanemab for Alzheimer's Disease - Part 6

Lecanemab’s modified intention to treat analysis should come with a warning

Tom Jefferson's avatar
Carl Heneghan's avatar
Tom Jefferson
and
Carl Heneghan
Sep 02, 2024
∙ Paid
52

Share this post

Trust the Evidence
Trust the Evidence
Investigating the miracle biologic Lecanemab for Alzheimer's Disease - Part 6
3
7
Share

Another issue that bothered us in the TTE office in the Lecanemab Early Alzheimer's Disease trial was the use of the modified intention-to-treat population for the efficacy analysis.

Share

Internal validity of clinical trials is the extent to which you trust the methods on which the results are based. There are some simple methodological issues, such as the presence or absence of randomisation, which allows you to understand whether the effect size is dramatically inflated due to differences in the baseline characteristics of the population.

Other essential methods, such as blinding, allocation concealment, and intention to treat, also affect the results. Now, bear with us while we explain one often confusing thing: the intention-to-treat analysis.

In an intention-to-treat analysis, the results are based on those initially assigned to the treatment and not just those who actually took the treatment (often referred to as per-protocol analysis). The intention to treat analysis mainly leads to sm…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Trust the Evidence to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Carl Heneghan
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share