Trust the Evidence

Trust the Evidence

Share this post

Trust the Evidence
Trust the Evidence
No solid evidence for IVF add-ons

No solid evidence for IVF add-ons

Who’d a thought it?

Carl Heneghan's avatar
Tom Jefferson's avatar
Carl Heneghan
and
Tom Jefferson
Mar 27, 2025
∙ Paid
56

Share this post

Trust the Evidence
Trust the Evidence
No solid evidence for IVF add-ons
8
6
Share

Can you appear on Sky News at 6.30 am? This is one of many emails, texts, or calls asking Carl to appear on the news. What for, he thought? “The fertility regulator HFEA has a report out tomorrow that says almost ¾ of fertility patients are being offered unnecessary tests and treatments.”

We’ve harked on the fact that not much has passed by the TTE office door regarding fraud, waste, or harm. So, here's the story that broke yesterday.

“According to the regulator, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), 73% of 1,500 patients surveyed between September and October 2024 said they had used an add-on in their latest round of treatment,” reported the BBC.

In 2016, we published an analysis of the Lack of evidence for interventions offered in UK fertility centres and an assessment of the claims made for fertility interventions in the BMJ.

Share Trust the Evidence

We found claims of benefit relating to 41 different fertility interventions across 74 fertility centre websites. You won't be surprised to hear…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Trust the Evidence to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Carl Heneghan
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share