Trust the Evidence

Trust the Evidence

Share this post

Trust the Evidence
Trust the Evidence
Reverse Engineering: Summing up - Part 1

Reverse Engineering: Summing up - Part 1

UKHSA's 100 models are not science.

Tom Jefferson's avatar
Carl Heneghan's avatar
Tom Jefferson
and
Carl Heneghan
Oct 15, 2023
∙ Paid
64

Share this post

Trust the Evidence
Trust the Evidence
Reverse Engineering: Summing up - Part 1
4
7
Share

As promised, we have not run away. We have now completed our undertaking to review the 100 models forming the backbone of the UKHSA’s latest offering: the mapping review called “Effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions to reduce transmission of COVID-19 in the UK”. 

Share

UKHSA did not extract nor appraise the evidence as they maintained they did not have the resources. If that is true and if “resources” means cash or expertise (or both), this is a serious situation, as you shall read. So, as we feel sorry for the poor old UKHSA, we have done the appraisal for them.

Earlier versions of the review were very poor but not as poor quality as the studies included in them. 

We focused on the 100 models identified in the mapping document as they form two-thirds of the unreviewed evidence base, and contemporary folklore would have us believe civil liberties in the UK were restricted on the basis of these models. 

For each paper reporting a model, we asked four questions, and here is what we fo…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Trust the Evidence to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Carl Heneghan
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share