Trust the Evidence

Trust the Evidence

The MHRA Papers - Part 7

There’s a lack of crucial data, but not to worry - the clock is ticking.

Tom Jefferson's avatar
Carl Heneghan's avatar
Tom Jefferson and Carl Heneghan
Jan 13, 2025
∙ Paid

SUMMARY: We are not sure about the potency of the stuff, RNA doing its own thing, the risk of anaphylaxis, Astra Zeneca’s use of polysorbate or their lack of data on severe cases or the elderly, but apart from that everything is OK and secret, of course.

Thanks for reading Trust the Evidence! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

We continue our review of the minutes of the meeting of the MHRA’s ​​Commission On Human Medicines (CHM) COVID-19 Vaccines Benefit Risk Expert Working Group, which took place on 17 December 2020.

Trust the Evidence is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

This very well-attended meeting (lots of secret members on the secret list or secret squirrels) discussed all three vaccines in contention for the prize of first to get the conditional market authorisation.

The Pfizer BioNTech vaccine batches did not appear very stable, with the mmRNA going off to do its own stuff in the vial…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Trust the Evidence to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Carl Heneghan · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture