The “Superflu” story shows that the health MSM is utterly untrustworthy
NHS senior managers and medical journals are no better
We have been chuntering on since early October that the government-media conglomerate was preparing to declare another emergency. The signs, which we have come to recognise, were all there.
Large stocks of vaccines and antivirals were purchased and renewed and are awaiting use. The avian influenza terror did not fly (no pun intended, as this is a serious post).
As early as the 6th of November, the recently appointed Sir Jim Mackey warned the UK was facing a long, tough flu season. Delivered through the BBC, of course.
Then we had the “carnage” and “superflu” with an ambulance and bed crisis, which did not fit with the government’s own data.
Throughout, the British Bias Corporation was busy spreading misleading news.
It’s not that other MSM outlets covered themselves in glory, all repeating variations of the same story.
Still, the difference is that the BBC is publicly funded and should be looking after the public interest instead of repeating the usual tripe, interviewing cats and asking th…
