Trust the Evidence

Trust the Evidence

Share this post

Trust the Evidence
Trust the Evidence
Why Dame June should stay on at the MHRA

Why Dame June should stay on at the MHRA

Revolving doors are an easy way out.

Tom Jefferson's avatar
Carl Heneghan's avatar
Tom Jefferson
and
Carl Heneghan
Dec 28, 2024
∙ Paid
71

Share this post

Trust the Evidence
Trust the Evidence
Why Dame June should stay on at the MHRA
19
6
Share

This article was originally posted on 28 February 2024. We are posting it again as a prelude to the forthcoming MHRA series. At the end of the series, we will ask you whether Dame June should stand in front of Parliament and be accountable for her actions.

Share Trust the Evidence

In the summer of 2023, we expressed our doubts about the UK MHRA’s ability to carry out its role of pharmacovigilance in an impartial way. Specifically, the MHRA seemed unable to follow through with deaths reported following Covid immunisation (see Readings).

Consider becoming a paid subscriber to receive new posts and support our work.

We wrote in a Mail Online article, “In September 2020, the MHRA signed a contract with a firm called Genpact (UK) for the extraction of data from the Yellow Card reports. Although heavily redacted, the statement of works is clear: “to extract ADR data from the Covid-19 related yellow cards…for selected data fields…”

The background to TTE’s observations was a reader’s complaint about the lack of follow-up…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Trust the Evidence to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Carl Heneghan
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share