Trust the Evidence

Trust the Evidence

Share this post

Trust the Evidence
Trust the Evidence
Why we shouldn't use the "F Word": the long read

Why we shouldn't use the "F Word": the long read

Officials and reporters ignore the consequences of lack of scientific rigour.

Tom Jefferson's avatar
Carl Heneghan's avatar
Tom Jefferson
and
Carl Heneghan
Jan 14, 2023
∙ Paid
73

Share this post

Trust the Evidence
Trust the Evidence
Why we shouldn't use the "F Word": the long read
2
Share

The colloquial “Flu,” the “F Word”, is synonymous with an acute respiratory infection, sometimes merging and overlapping with influenza. It is an ill-defined and sloppy concept which creates confusion about the burden of respiratory illness in the world around us. 

Share

Here are why officialdom and science should never use the “F Word”.

When the first human influenza virus was isolated in 1933 by Smith, Andrewes and Laidlaw, it was dubbed “influenza” as it was associated in ferrets and humans with an acute respiratory affliction that resembled that of great pandemics which still cast a very long shadow on humanity. “Influenza dei pianeti”, or influence of the planets, had been the name for waves of “F Word” cases which periodically and mysteriously appeared and vanished without clear rationale.

The three researchers could not see the virus, but they engineered its transmission to ferrets. They also knew it was not a bacterium as it passed through filters that would not allow a bacterium to pa…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Trust the Evidence to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Carl Heneghan
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share