21 Comments

Keep turning. I wrote a letter to "The Times" following its report of cancer being induced by inflammation.

"If, as your article today states, chronic inflammation is a driver for cancer, then any cause of such inflammation should be mitigated if possible. We know that the M-RNA vaccines against coronavirus are designed to induce the endogenous production of spike protein, which is a precipitant of an acute hyperimmune state that can result in serious inflammatory complaints such as myocarditis. We do not know how much spike protein is produced, nor how long for, as the research has never been done. It is possible that prolonged production occurs and may not only be the cause of Long Covid but, by inducing chronic inflammation, could also be oncogenic. The oncologist Angus Dalgleish has already suggested that covid vaccination can precipitate a sudden and explosive recurrence of existing cancer. It is vital therefore that long-term studies be conducted before subjecting the population to an undefined risk, and on that basis the M-RNA Covid vaccines should be withdrawn immediately."

Guess what? Not published.

Expand full comment

A small study just out, )less than 100 participants) showing proof of spike protein in blood after 700 days post vaxx. We tried to warn our loved ones. We were labelled anti vaxxes.

Expand full comment

I suspect it varies between individuals, perhaps related to genetic differences. Hope someone is looking at that.

Expand full comment

Sorry they didn't publish. Add to your list research ongoing at Yale, findings suggest a reawakening of Epstein - Barr virus following COVID m- RNA vaccination. How many had kissing disease as a teenager ?! It is difficult to discuss this with family who had the vaccine,and have since had health problems.

Expand full comment

"We do not know how much spike protein is produced, nor how long for ... " The recently published Yale study has it at 4 years and still counting, I believe.

They should do this with paracetamol. I'd save a fortune. <G>

Expand full comment

Andrew and all,.

You may find this interesting https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jg6FhqGl7M&t=30s. Dr Makis, Canadian, - Dr. William Makis MD. Radiologist, Oncologist, Cancer Researcher - has found 'turbo' and other unexpected cancers in his patients. Makis has crossed swords with Alberta Health Services over the Covid vax and they had removed him from a cancer centre, Alberta HS have now had a forced change in staff and all complaints against him have been removed. He raised $Can 150,000 on substack for his legal fees.

He also has a Repurposed Drugs for treating cancers video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBnT8es28WY. ThIs is not a crank, as I see it he uses conventional chemo etc plus drugs to enhance the effect.

Expand full comment

In the 'old days' the people who published this sort of detailed investigation were called 'investigative reporters'. Now we rely on independent determined academics lurking on Substack. After we are all dead all this will make a great movie.

Expand full comment

Rumours swirling on X….Trump will ban the covid vaxxes. Will the “inquiry” take any note if this occurs? Probably not. It will be filed under that crazy trump disinformation category. Despite Drs Jay Battacharya, Aseem Malhotra, Ryan Cole,, Harvey Risch, Scott Atlas, Robert Malone, Marty Makary, Pierre Kory, Thorp and hundreds of others calling for the immediate halt of the covid vaxxes.

Expand full comment

The Public Health Emergency PHE for covid has now been ongoing for 5 years. Before he was replaced Becerra, the US Health and Human Services secretary, extended the PREP Act, which is immunity from prosecution for a further 5 years until 31 Dec 2029. If Kennedy repeals the PHE this then the covid jabs all become illegal in the USA, immediately. Right now I think he is working out how he can do this. There are multiple layers of legallity to understand.

Expand full comment

Interesting comment on TDS by the Midwestern Doctor: "... I predicted the one thing which could get the scientific establishment to begin publishing data on vaccine injuries would be Trump becoming president again as there would then be a political incentive to criticize them (as Trump endorsed the COVID vaccines."

I think he has a point.

Expand full comment

I take my hat off to you both - because it’s really laudable that you are sharing this information and real hard work with everyone for free. I wish I could encourage more people to become paid subscribers but it’s difficult. By spreading this information as far and wide as possible drawing attention to the idiocy, lies, ignorance and secrecy surrounding this debacle we may be able to move forward. Nevertheless, I am always happy to support a big crowd funder in order for you to keep on working on this. Please keep it in mind. There’s no obligation for anyone to contribute but I would happily do so and NO, I don’t know either of you personally but I do know you’ve saved my sanity and I feel like you’re my only hope that something may be done about this! What price that ?

Expand full comment

Off-topic, but with reference to your article on the Assisted Dying Bill, here's an anecdote. But the evidence if first hand to me: someone I know was diagnosed with Pancreatic Cancer in July 2023 (likely it was delayed because the GP had refused to see her face to face for a few months). She was told she would be dead before Christmas if she didn't have treatment. Given the poor success of chemotherapy with this type of cancer, she decided not to have any treatment. As of today, she is still alive, albeit with carers coming into her home and waiting for a hospice place. Sounds like 5 months became 19.

Expand full comment

"So far, we have found a lack of evidence on the vaccine’s potential to interrupt transmission. We have seen that the selected subpopulations in the initial trials were not representative of the rollout population, and we uncovered persistent lymphopenia in trial populations, which could have devastating consequences. Several Comirnaty batches had quality assurance problems, and there were problems with some of the pre-release batches of Comirnaty, but few details were reported. Moreover, the meeting minutes gave the impression that despite the massive gaps in the evidence to use vaccines in - shall we say - extreme circumstances, it was business as usual when it comes to approving a novel technology."

so apart from that, all was good?

Expand full comment

thanks

"Yet, anyone with basic knowledge of the approval process would know about the switch and the potential risks posed by the change in the manufacturing process—that is, anyone but June."

poor lady; seems a look of complete bewilderment on her face in that photo; her predecessor went off to work for Billy Goat in 2019; Dr Ian Hudson; "Senior Advisor, Integrated Development, Global Health for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. He retired in February 2024."

I am sure; we are all sure; he gave very fine advice.

here in Dec2017, the MHRA was given a million quid by Gates; https://www.gov.uk/government/news/mhra-awarded-over-980000-for-collaboration-with-the-bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation-and-the-world-health-organisation

11 months later he will leaving MHRA https://pharmaphorum.com/news/ceo-of-uk-drugs-regulator-quits-as-brexit-nears; and he retires after faithful public service in Sept 2019

I hope Dr Raine will be able to move on from the MHRA to making an equally valuable contribution but perhaps in a private company this time.

a lot happening in 2019: June 2019 announced that Witty to take office Oct 2019;

Expand full comment

' Comparing the minutes of those withdrawn and reposted with further redactions shows that the primary purpose was to remove any mention of the manufacturing process and the batch identification and content. ' TTE

At the risk of stating what appears to me to be the bleeding obvious, just in case some are not on my wavelength - These minutes were removed on the Saturday prior to June Raine's Inquiry appearance. I would have expected her to have been coached on her upcoming performance immediately prior and the removal was necessary to allow her to answer the question of manufacturing process in an uncompromising way - as she did.

An allegation of Misconduct in a public office - seems to fit the actions,

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/misconduct-public-office

'The elements of the offence were summarised in Attorney General's Reference No 3 of 2003 [2004] EWCA Crim 868. The offence is committed when:

a public officer acting as such

wilfully neglects to perform their duty and/or wilfully misconducts themselves

to such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public's trust in the office holder

without reasonable excuse or justification'

House of Commons update?

Expand full comment

Dear Doctors / Professors / Old Geezers (I'm not sure how I should address you),

I am a paying subscriber, but thank you so much for making this information freely available.

This comment was written by a dumb sparky who knows how to read a chart of excess deaths.

Expand full comment

"This post was written by two old geezers who know how to turn over stones."

many thanks for all you do; we are in the presence of great wisdom.

Expand full comment

Thank you.

Expand full comment