12 Comments

When I was pregnant - back in the Stone Age obviously- about 10 years after the thalidomide scandal we were told not to take any drugs, not even paracetamol, because of the risks of adverse reactions. Now they are being encouraged (or worse) to take experimental “vaccines”. Goebbels is alive and well.

Expand full comment

Thanks for this closer look. Can someone explain why the mighty FDA hasn't collected the fines from BionTech, due to non-compliance with the reporting law? Is that sum too negligible and not worth the administrative effort or do they all fear the actual result seeing the light of scrutiny?

Expand full comment

Their own tests, no matter how poorly done, clearly showed unacceptable levels of adverse effects, which was enough to cancel the vaccines. Why would women submit to experimental vaccines in the first place, then after suffering adverse effects not say or do anything about it?

Expand full comment

Perhaps because their 'health care professionals' told them these adverse effects were 'in their minds', or were to with their pregnancies, so 'all normal' ...

Apologies for being so cynical ...

Expand full comment

You are in part correct

Expand full comment

Because most people have no medical background. Sadly many women “do as they are told” by their primary car provider. In the case of consenting to the mRNA covid vaxxes pregnant women have been duped. They dare not do anything that would harm their unborn child. And yet, nearly every ob/gyn in the USA recommended these mums to be get their covid vaxx. I could cry.

Expand full comment

It is both heartbreaking and so frustrating that doctors were, and still are, so indoctrinated into the medical industry protocol with seemingly no allowance for individual thought and inquiry. They don’t question anything and the few who do are persecuted.

Expand full comment

According to the MHRA, 190,034 submissions were submitted by the 36,604 registered individuals during the study period November 2020 to December 2022.

The Dutch agency LAREB, reported 1,135,201 submissions by the 234,620 registered individuals from January 2021 to March 2023

The proportion of people of 15 years or more is around 83% in both countries which means that there were 33.9 reports per 1,000 versus 75.8 per 1,000 respectively for the UK and Netherlands and 6.5 per 1,000 registered individuals versus 15.7 per 1,000. This two-fold difference supports the assertion that there was marked underreporting in the UK as the demographics are similar for both countries. IN the Netherlands only 3% of reports were made by healthcare professionals. Unless things are different now only healthcare professionals are familiar with the yellow card system. I am not saying the Dutch approach is better but it is surely time to design a system that is accessible, reliable, and fit for purpose.

Expand full comment

The non response maybe partially due to the arrival of an all consuming bundle of joy, and lack of sleep. Plus there seems to be a memory wipe of some of the pregnancy experience to ensure further children.

Expand full comment

‘Pregnant ladies, please take this vaccine, with no RCT evidence, built on a modality that has failed Phase 1 trials on safety grounds for 2 decades. But don’t eat blue cheese.’

Expand full comment

"We cannot explain this discrepancy. "

to even attempt to comment rationally on what these creatures produce; they appear to lie, lie, lie ..

not sure how many readers have ever watched the Rutles movie; there is one wonderful sequence there (there are many): Eric Idle is interviewing a lady in Mississippi and she exclaims frustratedly about her husband "he's lying; he's always lying; everytime there's one of these documentaries he tells them .." and the lady seems to sum it up for me and the whole madness of the last four years; that endlessly drags on .......

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXW1iI5dC0k 1 min in to this video .. says it all!!

Expand full comment