The MHRA Withdraws its Meeting Minutes
Censoring the censored?
Many thanks to our reader, John Davison, who alerted us to this:
Surprised? Aghast? Elated?
The best part is the rest of the page. Somebody forgot to take out the original posting page, but the UKHSA is still committed to transparency:
We can only guess as to why the minutes of the meetings of the MHRA’s ​​Commission On Human Medicines (CHM) COVID-19 Vaccines Benefit Risk Expert Working Group were withdrawn today. Shame may be high on the list.
It does not matter to us: We have downloaded all the PDFs and extracted all the critical text.Â
Whoever chose to override the FIOA has made a bad decision. Staff must be aware that under section 77 of FOIA, it is a criminal offence to deliberately conceal, tamper with or destroy information after it has already been requested.
Section 77 of FOIA States:
This post was written by two old geezers who would like to thank their readers for the support they received.
Dear Brian, to my knowledge Dr Bridle was the first to alert the public that that the LNPs went all over the rats’ systems and organs and they were designed to evade immunity. All this is explained in our Comirnaty series (see posts 9 to 9e). Exactly what went on when is what the Inquiry should be looking at instead of kowtowing to modellers.
Best wishes, Tom
This has panic written all over it. I would add your warning to all future posts. 'Staff must be aware that under section 77 of FOIA, it is a criminal offence to deliberately conceal, tamper with or destroy information after it has already been requested.'