Dear Brian, to my knowledge Dr Bridle was the first to alert the public that that the LNPs went all over the rats’ systems and organs and they were designed to evade immunity. All this is explained in our Comirnaty series (see posts 9 to 9e). Exactly what went on when is what the Inquiry should be looking at instead of kowtowing to modellers.
This has panic written all over it. I would add your warning to all future posts. 'Staff must be aware that under section 77 of FOIA, it is a criminal offence to deliberately conceal, tamper with or destroy information after it has already been requested.'
Amongst other matters it questions why the product was treated as a vaccine when it is a genetic therapy. Which of course, is relevant to the MHRA's role.
The Australian TGA (Therapeutics Goods Administration) equivalent to the MHRA has a January 2021 Pfizer Report that appears to show that there was no benefit in the product in animal studies, shows the product is distributed throughout the body - we were told it remained in the deltoid, etc.
The Report had to be dragged out of the TGA using FoI twice, the second time to remove the redactions, link is in the video. Clearly, as the video says someone knew the right question to ask.
When did MHRA know of the content of this report ? Has Pfizer failed to notify MHRA or has MHRA failed in its duties?
What the fluffing fluff! Do these cretins not know that once it's on the interwebz it can't be 'redacted' as they wish? Or will they now perform a new dance, along the lines of "we don't have the data (never mind that we've removed them) and so what ever you say is fake"?
So often it's not the original issue which creates the scandal, it's the cover-up.
I suspect in the end there will be some kind of judicial proceedings where all these issues will need to be considered. This could take many years, but it's important to garner the evidence meanwhile.
Did the authorising authority know, or should have known, the risks presented to patients by these products which are really gene therapies.
BTW in case you've not seen it https://hedleyrees.substack.com/p/uk-mhra-to-recognise-medicine-approvals-d70 Since 2023t he MHRA does not need to approve anything if another trusted country has already done so. .... hmmm and there's the USA under permanent pandemic Emergency Use Authorization, unless they choose to adopt constitutional ways when it suits them. Nice job when you can pick your own rules.
Dear Brian, to my knowledge Dr Bridle was the first to alert the public that that the LNPs went all over the rats’ systems and organs and they were designed to evade immunity. All this is explained in our Comirnaty series (see posts 9 to 9e). Exactly what went on when is what the Inquiry should be looking at instead of kowtowing to modellers.
Best wishes, Tom
This has panic written all over it. I would add your warning to all future posts. 'Staff must be aware that under section 77 of FOIA, it is a criminal offence to deliberately conceal, tamper with or destroy information after it has already been requested.'
The good news is that someone in the MHRA is reading (and I presume) subscribing to your Substack!
You must be getting close to hitting some 🎯…..
(paraphrased) I love the sound of sphincters tightening in the morning...
Well that's taken your ball away, what are you going to play with now!
Try this Japanese video from aussie17 its subbed https://www.aussie17.com/p/breaking-japanese-press-conference?utm_source=podcast-email&publication_id=1242457&post_id=155057742&utm_campaign=email-play-on-substack&utm_content=watch_now_button&r=2gkrwp&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
Amongst other matters it questions why the product was treated as a vaccine when it is a genetic therapy. Which of course, is relevant to the MHRA's role.
LUKE 8:17 ??????
FOR THERE IS NOTHING HIDDEN THAT WILL NOT BE DISCLOSED, AND NOTHING CONCEALED THAT WILL NOT BE KNOWN OR BROUGHT OUT INTO THE OPEN !!!!!!!
Thank You Our Much Loved Old Geezers XXXXXXXXXXXX
The relevant Feb 15 minute (I suppose one should now say the provisional version) is available on the wayback machine:
https://web.archive.org/web/20241223024542/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/675051b9d12a2dad3bc97a90/25._COVID19VBR_EWG_15_February_2021.pdf
The link itself now states that the minute was "published in error", although I'm not at all sure what that means.
Smoke has been sighted at Canary Wharf in London.
The Australian TGA (Therapeutics Goods Administration) equivalent to the MHRA has a January 2021 Pfizer Report that appears to show that there was no benefit in the product in animal studies, shows the product is distributed throughout the body - we were told it remained in the deltoid, etc.
The Report had to be dragged out of the TGA using FoI twice, the second time to remove the redactions, link is in the video. Clearly, as the video says someone knew the right question to ask.
When did MHRA know of the content of this report ? Has Pfizer failed to notify MHRA or has MHRA failed in its duties?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8kaXrEQB5M
What the fluffing fluff! Do these cretins not know that once it's on the interwebz it can't be 'redacted' as they wish? Or will they now perform a new dance, along the lines of "we don't have the data (never mind that we've removed them) and so what ever you say is fake"?
Why is the British State so ‘kin useless?
Unless it is supporting death and destruction.
And now it turns out that PayPal ‘debanked’ lockdown critics because of their views:
https://archive.ph/czA7H
- and the woodwork slowly disgorges, as eventually it always must.
Republished later - in 75 years maybe.
You’re over the target! Thank you.
So often it's not the original issue which creates the scandal, it's the cover-up.
I suspect in the end there will be some kind of judicial proceedings where all these issues will need to be considered. This could take many years, but it's important to garner the evidence meanwhile.
Did the authorising authority know, or should have known, the risks presented to patients by these products which are really gene therapies.
https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/part-1-blood-samples-contain-dna?r=1dwgdy&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
BTW in case you've not seen it https://hedleyrees.substack.com/p/uk-mhra-to-recognise-medicine-approvals-d70 Since 2023t he MHRA does not need to approve anything if another trusted country has already done so. .... hmmm and there's the USA under permanent pandemic Emergency Use Authorization, unless they choose to adopt constitutional ways when it suits them. Nice job when you can pick your own rules.
Saved to the Wayback archive on December 22, 2024. Does this have anything you didn't already have? http://web.archive.org/web/20241222143744/https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/meeting-minutes-of-the-vaccine-benefit-risk-expert-working-group-from-the-covid-19-pandemic