Good exposition of my previously published view that the wrong experts (lawyers) are asking the wrong questions of the wrong people. My personal "Inquiry" concludes that the only necessity was to identify any at risk groups, identify the tests that would confirm serious illness (aka the cytokine storm known as Covid-19) and apply the right treatment. On the basis that Covid is down to a reaction to the original spike protein, getting the body to manufacture it by introducing M-RNA that causes this it is a given that the vaccine will produce side-effects, and as we have no idea how much spike protein will be produced, or for how long, then the whole basis of vaccination, or rather gene therapy, is highly dangerous. Treat the sick and ignore the 98+% who don't get sick.
I'm merely an NHS trained manager and strategic planner with 27 months postgrad studies at Manchester University - not a fancy scientist or doctor with a PhD - and I had figured out for myself by April 2020, - based on existing knowledge about the absence of a cure for the common cold and the flu - that it was highly improbable that a miracle cure could be found for Covid, and that naturally acquired herd immunity was the only way out of this little pickle.
What's more, we all had Covid (or something insanely similar) in this household back in December 2019 following a visit from a friend from the USA who works on one of America's biggest garrison towns. (clearly the 2019 Wuhan Military Games flu episode was hushed up as a military secret - and I hope that Robert Kennedy Jnr can expose those files)
And despite our age and alleged vulnerability, (our son aged 25 then has Downs syndrome and Diabetes T1 ) none of us needed any medical attention at all. In fact he brushed it off with the most trivial symptoms of all ;-)
Hypothesis: a piece in The Times today (18th February) links chronic inflammation to cancer. So if a persistent hyperimmune state could be generated by persistent spike protein produced endogenously, might this explain Angus Dalgleish’s observation of cancers erupting after vaccination with M-RNA that causes such production?
Maybe. But it needs investigation and it would be unethical to continue using M-RNA vaccines until we know.
Hi Bilbo, thanks for your comment. This is the same story as influenza (connecting the dots series) and Covid 19 (for example incidence from the placebo arm of the Cominarty registration trial).
Inflation of figures, stonewalling of the public, misleading (“flu" and “influenza") or stereotyped replies and similar are the reason why someone questioned if there is democracy in Europe.
We warned about the RSV industry nearly two years ago and recently we have done the same for humanmetapneumovirus (HMPV).
It always amuses me that the peak number of 'cases', according to the Government's covid dashboard was 5/1/2022. It peaked at over 3 x the next highest peak. This was 3 months after the completion of the rollout.
Hugo Keith KC could go look at any of the UKHSA vaccine surveillance weekly reports showing that hospital admissions & deaths in the vaccinated & unvaccinated were in line with the proportion of the population in either group.
Finally, Keith & his ilk cleave to the notion that the vaccines saved 20m lives in 2021. In general 60m people die worldwide annually, so without them deaths would have been a 1/3rd higher? Laughable.
Thorp and Farber's new Book "Sacrifice: How the Deadliest Vaccine in History Targeted the Most Vulnerable" is published in two days time. In the USA 1,000 foetuses aborted on the day of their mothers' transfection. Nothing to see here. Move along.
More than one million people have been vaccinated against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), after the NHS launched a rollout of the jab for the first time in its history this autumn.Data published today shows NHS staff have delivered 1,047,208 RSV vaccinations in just over two months, as the NHS ramps up efforts to avoid a tripledemic of COVID-19, flu and RSV this winter…….
From 1 September 2024, under the NHS, 1,047,208 RSV vaccinations were rolled out in just over two months as part of a rolling programme. On hearing of increasing media coverage of fears around RSV, I wondered if we may be facing another terrifying pandemic so I made a FOI request. Please see below.
My FOI Request
February 4 2025
Our Reference FOI: 2025 - 2528
“I requested under a FOI request would you please provide me with details of deaths attributable to RSV in England in 2022. Previously, responding to a similar request in October 2024 you sent me 2021 details in very easily understood small charts.
This time I have been given 4 different codes for deaths attributable to RSV together with a mass of information needing to be sifted through and accurately completed to obtain the figures for England. ………I believe I have been swamped with loads of statistical information to make it harder for me to obtain the figures. Also it appears that the ICD codes have been widened to 4 categories for deaths attributed to RSV for 2022. Is that correct please? Please see my previous request in October 2024 and how simply that was answered. (FOI-2024-2293). “ BB
2nd Reply FOI: 2025 - 2528
“Good morning,
Thank you for your email. I apologise for the difficulty you have experienced in accessing the number of deaths. I have done this for you following the guidance provided by the relevant department and I have found the number of deaths registered in England and Wales in 2022 where the underlying cause was respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) was 17……..”
So, in summary were 1,047,208 RSV vaccinations in just over two months in 2024 possibly modelled on the spectral figure of 17 deaths in England and Wales in 2022?
This is a mockery of democracy, and it is our money being spent on these so called experts on law and medicine. It is so obvious that they are all following the narrative, it is not in our governments interests to expose the shortcomings of the covid debacle. There is no point in spending more money for the same result
"......depending on the status of the COVID-19 pandemic, its severity and impact on hospitalisation, the benefits of immunisation in individuals aged under 30 years MAY be outweighed by the potential risks."
I think it's true that the UK 'Oxford' vaccine was letter withdrawn from use because of these concerns.
(Covid 19 Vbr Ewg 26 April 2021 Para 3.7.1)
Mr Keith's opening statement:
“The expert evidence commissioned by this Inquiry is to the effect that there was no reduction in the efficacy or safety of ANY of the vaccines, or the trials, as a result of this process.”
I don't think these two statements can both be true. There was a reduction in the safety assessment of one of the vaccines as a result of the process.
Just listen to Prof Robert Clancy on John Campbell
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSrnphjUH0w at 1 hr 18mins he talks about mumps and measles being blood borne and react very well to vaccination, while a respiratory borne virus eg flu, common cold, RSV etc do not react well and repeated vaccination causing reduced effect.
Why are we using mRNA vaccines for covid - a respiratory virus because it looks like prior knowledge that they wouldn't work well? Who took the policy decision?
More than one million people have been vaccinated against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), after the NHS launched a rollout of the jab for the first time in its history this autumn. Data published today shows NHS staff have delivered 1,047,208 RSV vaccinations in just over two months, as the NHS ramps up efforts to avoid a tripledemic of COVID-19, flu and RSV this winter…….”
Under a very recent FOI request, I discovered just 77 deaths were officially attributed to RSV in 2022. ……..The money making juggernaut rolls on regardless of efficacy. As you write this say, who took the policy decision?
To answer my own question using AI it was JCVI who made the decision. Of course all they know about is vaccines so they are going to sell your own goods . Two issues
1. Immunologists are needed to provide some input - I'm not certain JCVI has sufficient, if any, all we are getting is a one-sided view of isn't my life long research just wonderful.
2. Did RSV ever cause a problem - listening to Campbell and Clancy above it didn't
Perhaps we need to look at JCVI minutes, advice, conflicts of interest and committee composition. Prof Andrew Pollard, Chair, was on BBC Today prog a short while back Covid vaccine saved 12-20 million lives - I complained to BBC that this was mis-information, because you can't measure a 'saved' life - of course no reply from BBC.
When would the BBC ever engage in a logical argument as to how do you measure a ‘saved’ life. They haven’t got the resources to engage in such a philosophical debate. They are too busy learning their lines every day.
Good exposition of my previously published view that the wrong experts (lawyers) are asking the wrong questions of the wrong people. My personal "Inquiry" concludes that the only necessity was to identify any at risk groups, identify the tests that would confirm serious illness (aka the cytokine storm known as Covid-19) and apply the right treatment. On the basis that Covid is down to a reaction to the original spike protein, getting the body to manufacture it by introducing M-RNA that causes this it is a given that the vaccine will produce side-effects, and as we have no idea how much spike protein will be produced, or for how long, then the whole basis of vaccination, or rather gene therapy, is highly dangerous. Treat the sick and ignore the 98+% who don't get sick.
That's one side of A4. I claim my £200m.
I'm merely an NHS trained manager and strategic planner with 27 months postgrad studies at Manchester University - not a fancy scientist or doctor with a PhD - and I had figured out for myself by April 2020, - based on existing knowledge about the absence of a cure for the common cold and the flu - that it was highly improbable that a miracle cure could be found for Covid, and that naturally acquired herd immunity was the only way out of this little pickle.
What's more, we all had Covid (or something insanely similar) in this household back in December 2019 following a visit from a friend from the USA who works on one of America's biggest garrison towns. (clearly the 2019 Wuhan Military Games flu episode was hushed up as a military secret - and I hope that Robert Kennedy Jnr can expose those files)
And despite our age and alleged vulnerability, (our son aged 25 then has Downs syndrome and Diabetes T1 ) none of us needed any medical attention at all. In fact he brushed it off with the most trivial symptoms of all ;-)
Yes, this was a plandemic all right - IMHO.
so well said Dr Bamji
Hypothesis: a piece in The Times today (18th February) links chronic inflammation to cancer. So if a persistent hyperimmune state could be generated by persistent spike protein produced endogenously, might this explain Angus Dalgleish’s observation of cancers erupting after vaccination with M-RNA that causes such production?
Maybe. But it needs investigation and it would be unethical to continue using M-RNA vaccines until we know.
Hi Bilbo, thanks for your comment. This is the same story as influenza (connecting the dots series) and Covid 19 (for example incidence from the placebo arm of the Cominarty registration trial).
Inflation of figures, stonewalling of the public, misleading (“flu" and “influenza") or stereotyped replies and similar are the reason why someone questioned if there is democracy in Europe.
We warned about the RSV industry nearly two years ago and recently we have done the same for humanmetapneumovirus (HMPV).
Best wishes and keep commenting.
An old geezer.
It’s a total farce and a criminally expensive one at that
It always amuses me that the peak number of 'cases', according to the Government's covid dashboard was 5/1/2022. It peaked at over 3 x the next highest peak. This was 3 months after the completion of the rollout.
Hugo Keith KC could go look at any of the UKHSA vaccine surveillance weekly reports showing that hospital admissions & deaths in the vaccinated & unvaccinated were in line with the proportion of the population in either group.
Finally, Keith & his ilk cleave to the notion that the vaccines saved 20m lives in 2021. In general 60m people die worldwide annually, so without them deaths would have been a 1/3rd higher? Laughable.
Mr Keith is asking all the wrong questions and not necessarily in the right order.
(Apologies to E. Morecambe Esq.)
Mr Keith displaying the unfathomable depths of the arrogance of the english ruling class; cast all aside with a sweep of his dismissive hand.
" ...the Covid-19 vaccines had prevented more than 23 million infections and 123,000 deaths in the United Kingdom."
Of course, another way of preventing death was simply to move house. If you lived in France, simply moving to Germany would do the trick.
A wash. One big wash. £200 million spent to discover what? Nothing. A wash.
Thorp and Farber's new Book "Sacrifice: How the Deadliest Vaccine in History Targeted the Most Vulnerable" is published in two days time. In the USA 1,000 foetuses aborted on the day of their mothers' transfection. Nothing to see here. Move along.
RISKS VS BENEFITS
“21 November 2024
More than one million people have been vaccinated against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), after the NHS launched a rollout of the jab for the first time in its history this autumn.Data published today shows NHS staff have delivered 1,047,208 RSV vaccinations in just over two months, as the NHS ramps up efforts to avoid a tripledemic of COVID-19, flu and RSV this winter…….
https://www.england.nhs.uk/news/?filter-keyword=&filter-category=winter-news
Risks vs Benefits
From 1 September 2024, under the NHS, 1,047,208 RSV vaccinations were rolled out in just over two months as part of a rolling programme. On hearing of increasing media coverage of fears around RSV, I wondered if we may be facing another terrifying pandemic so I made a FOI request. Please see below.
My FOI Request
February 4 2025
Our Reference FOI: 2025 - 2528
“I requested under a FOI request would you please provide me with details of deaths attributable to RSV in England in 2022. Previously, responding to a similar request in October 2024 you sent me 2021 details in very easily understood small charts.
This time I have been given 4 different codes for deaths attributable to RSV together with a mass of information needing to be sifted through and accurately completed to obtain the figures for England. ………I believe I have been swamped with loads of statistical information to make it harder for me to obtain the figures. Also it appears that the ICD codes have been widened to 4 categories for deaths attributed to RSV for 2022. Is that correct please? Please see my previous request in October 2024 and how simply that was answered. (FOI-2024-2293). “ BB
2nd Reply FOI: 2025 - 2528
“Good morning,
Thank you for your email. I apologise for the difficulty you have experienced in accessing the number of deaths. I have done this for you following the guidance provided by the relevant department and I have found the number of deaths registered in England and Wales in 2022 where the underlying cause was respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) was 17……..”
So, in summary were 1,047,208 RSV vaccinations in just over two months in 2024 possibly modelled on the spectral figure of 17 deaths in England and Wales in 2022?
Sorry this hiccuped a little hence repetition. Literally stuck in my crawl….😉
This is a mockery of democracy, and it is our money being spent on these so called experts on law and medicine. It is so obvious that they are all following the narrative, it is not in our governments interests to expose the shortcomings of the covid debacle. There is no point in spending more money for the same result
EWG minutes as part of the MHRA papers:
"......depending on the status of the COVID-19 pandemic, its severity and impact on hospitalisation, the benefits of immunisation in individuals aged under 30 years MAY be outweighed by the potential risks."
I think it's true that the UK 'Oxford' vaccine was letter withdrawn from use because of these concerns.
(Covid 19 Vbr Ewg 26 April 2021 Para 3.7.1)
Mr Keith's opening statement:
“The expert evidence commissioned by this Inquiry is to the effect that there was no reduction in the efficacy or safety of ANY of the vaccines, or the trials, as a result of this process.”
I don't think these two statements can both be true. There was a reduction in the safety assessment of one of the vaccines as a result of the process.
But perhaps I misunderstand Mr Keith's point.
What a useless, conceited, useless, pompous, useless again git is Hugo Keith KC. Poor King if that is his level of Council.
None of us is the slightest bit surprised.
Outrageously biased.
Just listen to Prof Robert Clancy on John Campbell
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSrnphjUH0w at 1 hr 18mins he talks about mumps and measles being blood borne and react very well to vaccination, while a respiratory borne virus eg flu, common cold, RSV etc do not react well and repeated vaccination causing reduced effect.
Why are we using mRNA vaccines for covid - a respiratory virus because it looks like prior knowledge that they wouldn't work well? Who took the policy decision?
“21 November 2024
More than one million people have been vaccinated against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), after the NHS launched a rollout of the jab for the first time in its history this autumn. Data published today shows NHS staff have delivered 1,047,208 RSV vaccinations in just over two months, as the NHS ramps up efforts to avoid a tripledemic of COVID-19, flu and RSV this winter…….”
Under a very recent FOI request, I discovered just 77 deaths were officially attributed to RSV in 2022. ……..The money making juggernaut rolls on regardless of efficacy. As you write this say, who took the policy decision?
Sorry should have said ‘rightly say’ …..
To answer my own question using AI it was JCVI who made the decision. Of course all they know about is vaccines so they are going to sell your own goods . Two issues
1. Immunologists are needed to provide some input - I'm not certain JCVI has sufficient, if any, all we are getting is a one-sided view of isn't my life long research just wonderful.
2. Did RSV ever cause a problem - listening to Campbell and Clancy above it didn't
Perhaps we need to look at JCVI minutes, advice, conflicts of interest and committee composition. Prof Andrew Pollard, Chair, was on BBC Today prog a short while back Covid vaccine saved 12-20 million lives - I complained to BBC that this was mis-information, because you can't measure a 'saved' life - of course no reply from BBC.
When would the BBC ever engage in a logical argument as to how do you measure a ‘saved’ life. They haven’t got the resources to engage in such a philosophical debate. They are too busy learning their lines every day.
Are but,... the soon to be Sir Hugo Keith KC will be well rewarded by the establishment, put money on it.